Energy chain systems vs festooning

Cable Festoon System vs. Cable Carrier

igus® alternative to a cable festoon system

Advantages of e-chain® systems

  • Essentially maintenance free operation
  • Decreased mechanical stress on cables
  • No additional motors or controls required for long travels
  • Roller chains  allow for a significant reduction in required drive force
  • Approx. 50% less cable length required
  • Cables are guided with a defined bending radius at all times
  • Guide trough secures system from wind effects
  • Easily add or replace cables as needed in the carrier
  • Trolley speeds of up to 32.8ft/s and travel distances of up to 2,600 ft

White Paper: Efficient energy supply systems for cranes in steel plants

White paper cable festoon systems in steel plants

Learn the advantages of e-chains® vs. cable festoon systems.

  • Advantages and disadvantages of energy chain systems and cable festoon systems for steelworks cranes
  • The most innovative solution for cranes for steel plants
  • Future technologies: roller energy chains

What are the differences between e-chain® cable carriers and a cable festoon system?

cable festoon system

Energy chain system

cable festoon system

Cable festoon system

Case Study: of a cable festoon system at a 100m plant

Energy chain system review

  • About 50% less cable
  • Approx. 800mm system height
  • About 10% less structural steel (cable festoon system)

Cable festoon system review

  • Approx. 115m cable (115% travel length) for 100m travel
  • About 3,500mm length for the "cable loops"
  • System height approx. 5,000mm
cable festoon system infographic

The Challenges of Cable Festoon Systems

Alternative cable festoon system products

e-chain® festoon cable carriers

e-chains festoon cable carrier
  • P4HD - e-chain® with the longest service life
  • P4.1 - The universal e-chain®
  • Guide troughs - Long travel accessories

chainflex® festoon cables

chainflex® festoon cables

Sensors for crane festoon system


Replacement cable festoon system applications

Goliath crane shipyard roller energy chain

Roller energy chain replaces cable tender on Goliath crane

Goliath crane shipyard energy supply

Energy supply at 61kg/m cable weight

Goliath crane

Supply of 16 trolleys for Goliath crane

Goliath shipyard crane STX Roller e-chains

Roller e-chains for 1500t shipyard crane

8 Common questions when considering a cable festoon system

  • Traditional cable festoon systems can be prone to entanglement during operation, leading to downtime, and they require huge lengths of cable, taking up a great deal of space and needing protective cladding, which increases the mechanical stress on the cables
  • Cable festoon systems consume space on the crane rail, limiting the amount of crane travel that can be accomplished, and the structure makes cable replacement or addition a time-consuming process.
  • Unprotected cables in festoon systems can swing, become tangled, and get caught in the crane structure, especially during harsh weather, leading to costly repairs and downtime.
  • Cable festoon systems require approximately 115% of the travel length in cable, while energy chain systems require about 50% less cable, reducing mechanical stress and system weight.
  • Cable festoon systems have to be specially protected in harsh environments, increasing the total weight of the system and the steel structures required to bear the large cable lengths and the cable junction.
  • Cable carriers can lead to lower operational costs and increased energy savings due to their energy-efficient design and reduced maintenance requirements. In contrast, cable festoon systems have limits with regard to energy efficiency and service life, requiring higher energy input and maintenance costs..
  • The low wear properties of cable carriers ensure a high service life and minimize maintenance requirements and downtime, while cable festoon systems have suboptimal wear behavior, increasing the need for maintenance and potentially causing system downtime in the long term.
  • Cable carriers, made from tribologically optimized polymers, ensure a high service life and minimize maintenance requirements and downtime, providing a durable and low-cost solution for industrial crane systems. In contrast, cable festoon systems have proven to have limits with regard to energy efficiency and service life, requiring extensive protective cladding and being relatively heavy.
microflizz vs busbars

Energy chain systems instead of busbar systems

More crane technology information

chainflex® Flexible Cables in Stage Technology

10 tips for the crane industry

crane industry Brochure

Crane industry brochure

Orange Service

Engineering Services

Discuss your project with an expert!